Age Verification on Android and iOS, Sideloading for Verified Apps Only

Google is making some changes to Android that make it more restrictive than I’ve previously thought of it. Age verification for apps is coming to Android, and side loading is being restricted to apps that have been “verified” by Google. This is something that is coming to conform to new laws. Apple is also making some changes to conform and published information about it earlier this year. I just received Android’s notification about the change. The full e-mail is appended to the end of this post.

App Verification for Sideloaded Apps

Sideloading is the practice of loading applications onto the device outside of an app store. For Android, this usually involves changing a setting on the phone to allow applications from unknown sources, copying a .apk file to the device, and opening it for the phone to install the app within the .apk. To make an app, someone could download Android Studio, write their code, package their app, and share it with their friends at no cost. Google says that a side-loaded application is 50 times more likely to contain malware. For a developer to distribute their app outside of the Play Store, the developer must register with Google. This is a change from being able to build an app and make the .apk available without interacting with Google. Users who do not load applications outside of the Play Store will not see a difference.

Age Verification

Age verification is attributed to several state laws. The most prominent one referenced is Texas’s Senate Bill 2420. This bill says it regulates the sale of applications to mobile devices. It creates an obligation for app stores to inquire and verify user ages and categorize users into one of a defined set of categories.

  • Age 13 or older but younger than 16
  • At least 16 but younger than 18
  • 18 or older

For each application that a minor downloads, the download will require the consent of the parent. The developers are obligated to come up with age ratings for the applications based on the categories above. The developer must disclose information on the elements of the software that lead to a particular setting being selected. Safety-related features must be enabled in response to the younger age categories. The Texas bill also says that the parent of a minor can make civil damage claims against a developer or app store for failing to meet the requirements.

Expected Impacts

My expectation is that a typical end-user is not likely to notice any change from this bill. At most, there’s the possibility of apps from smaller independent developers that may disappear if it is not eventually updated to conform. From what I’ve seen of the children in my family, they are more inclined to install new apps, especially games. I expect parents to be bugged a lot more about giving permission to install apps. That said, it isn’t unusual for a child to have access to their parents’ phones and sometimes certain passwords. I can’t help but expect that some non-significant portion of children may just use their parents’ phones or passwords to approve themselves.

Different than 1996

These restrictions remind me of another set of restrictions from 29 years ago. In 1996, Congress passed a bipartisan bill, the Communications and Decency Act. A part of that bill required that any website that may have content that isn’t appropriate for children perform age verification and filtering. Most of this bill failed and was enjoined as unconstitutional. The bill’s requirement for age verification would burden lawfully speaking adults and non-commercial interactions. The only portion of that bill that survives as a law today is a law that many simply refer to as Section 230 (47 USC §230). §230 provides a civil defense from liability for what someone else posted to an interactive computer service. The implementation of the Texas bill and others differs from the 1996 Act in that it targets commercial entities (App stores).

The Email from Google

What’s happening

A few U.S. states, currently Texas, Utah, and Louisiana, have recently passed verification laws requiring app stores to verify users’ ages, obtain parental approval, and provide users’ age information to developers. These laws also create new obligations for developers who distribute their apps through app stores in these states.

Our plan to support you

While we have user privacy and trust concerns with these new verification laws, Google Play is designing APIs, systems, and tools to help you meet your obligations. The first verification law to take effect is Texas’s SB 2420 on January 1, 2026. Given short implementation timelines, we are sharing details about the Play Age Signals API (beta) and have made the API integration guide available to you.

What this means for you

These laws impose significant new requirements on many apps that may need to provide age appropriate experiences to users in these states. These requirements include ingesting users’ age ranges and parental approval status for significant changes from app stores and notifying app stores of significant changes. It is important that you review these laws and understand your obligations.

If you have any additional questions, please contact our support team.

Thank you,
Your Google Play team


Posts may contain products with affiliate links. When you make purchases using these links, we receive a small commission at no extra cost to you. Thank you for your support.

Mastodon: @j2inet@masto.ai
Instagram: @j2inet
Facebook: @j2inet
YouTube: @j2inet
Telegram: j2inet
Bluesky: @j2i.net

Starliner Launch Attempt Scheduled for 17 May 2024

UPDATE: The launch is now delayed until 17 May to give time to replace O2 pressure regulation valve.

Boing is going to make a second attempt to launch its Starliner manned spacecraft. The first attempt was scrubbed because of a stuck valve. The next attempt is scheduled for Thursday 8 May at about 10:11 PM. Emphasis on “Attempt” because there is no guarantee that it will happen. The craft is capable of holding up to 7 people. But for this test flight there will only be three people. Barry Willmore, 61, is a NASA astronaut and former U.S. Navy Captain that will be in command. Sunita Williams, 58, is a former Navy server member, will be piloting. The flight plan for the Starliner includes a stay at the International Space Station for a week before returning the astronauts. If this launches, this will be Boeing’s first manned space flight.

This won’t be the first flight of the spacecraft itself. It first launched in 2019, but failed to rendezvous with the Space Station because of a software error. It was successful in a launch in May 2022. Though after that flight Boeing decided to change the type of tape used on the electrical cables to a material that was more fire resistant since then.

NASA Receives Orders to Develop a Lunar Time Zone

The Whitehouse has sent NASA orders to develop a lunar time zone. At first glance, some might think that this is silly. There are no people on the moon, why is a time zone needed? While it is easy to coordinate time on earth, coordinating time between the earth and moon is a bit different because of the effects of gravity/mass on the passage of time. The moon has less mass than the earth, resulting in time passing at a different rate. The difference in the rate of the passage of time is tiny, but can be significant when working with high-precision clocks. A clock on the moon and earth would drift apart by about 58 microseconds per day.

NASA was asked to come up with the system for Lunar Coordinated Time by the end of 2026. The efforts will include contributions of international bodies and the 36 nations that are part of the Artemis Accords. This will add to the systems of time used in astronomy such as a solar day, mean solar day, sidereal day, and the 11 time zones on Mars.


Posts may contain products with affiliate links. When you make purchases using these links, we receive a small commission at no extra cost to you. Thank you for your support.

Mastodon: @j2inet@masto.ai
Instagram: @j2inet
Facebook: @j2inet
YouTube: @j2inet
Telegram: j2inet
Twitter: @j2inet

Apple, Alphabet, Amazon, and Facebook Called to Congress

Monopoly logo

Some of the largest technology companies in the USA have yet again been called to testify at the House of Representatives to testify. They have been called many times before. This time it is on competition. Some have alleged that each of these companies has done something to hinder competition and they are being called to speak on it. In a letter written to these companies the House has asked that the CEOs of these companies be the ones to testify. They are also asking the companies to produce documents that were generated in response to competition. If the companies do not produce documentation they may be subpoenaed and obligated to produce it anyway.

For Apple the only way to publish an application is through the Apple App Store. For applications published thay way Apple earns a portion of the sales and subscriptions. Apps sold through the App store cannot advertise paying for services through means other than the App store.

Alphabet (the parent company of Google) has been accused of anticompetitive behaviours along several fronts. This includes giving preference to Alphabet provided serviced in Google searches and having an extensive advertising vertical.

Amazon is a bit unique. Previous anticompetitive cases have focused on consumer welfare. But Amazon’s practices haven’t met past criteria for poor consumer welfare. Amazon has access to lots of sells data and the computational and AI capabilities for profitably using that information and under pricing those that sell through their service.

Facebook has been accused of cutting developers off from their services to serve their own purposes. They have also purchased other services that might have competed with them otherwise (ex:Instagram). Some competitors have described Facebook as an unlawful monopoly.

Whether or not these companies engage in anticompetitive behaviour is a topic of debate. This hearing is part of an ongoing investigation into competition in technology. At the same time the EU is launching an anti-competitive investigation on Apple’s App Store and on Apple Pay. The investigation is based on a complaint from Spotify from last year and a complaint from an unnamed ebook/audio-book distributor. Their complaints are on the fee that must be payed to Apple for services purchased through the user’s iOS device and the prohibitions on communicating to users how they can upgrade their services through other means. For Apple Pay the investigation is on that being the only contactless payment solution that can be deployed to the iPhone. Especially at a time when there is increased interest in contacless transactions in the wake of COVID-19.

Instagram LogoLinked In

NEWS:Linux on Dex Coming to More Devices

LoD

Samsung has announced that Linux on Dex is coming to more devices. Previously it was only available on non-LTE models of the Galaxy Tab S4 and on the Galaxy Note 9. Per an email that Samsung sent on Monday support is coming to the Android Pie builds of the  S9, S9+, S10e, S10+, Tab S4, and Tab S5e.

Based on interaction with others (and also being my own personal story) there are owners of the TAB S4 that haven’t yet received Linux on Dex support that wait with anticipation for support to come. I’ve not been able to confirm compatibility yet as the Pie build of Android isn’t yet available for my device. The Linux on Dex page had previously stated that none of the LTE Tab S4 models were supported. The page now only states that the Verizon LTE tablets are not supported.  I hope that this means that support for my device is coming. For now the only option is to wait.

Update (2019-April 30): Today I received the Android Pie update for the Galaxy Tab S4. It does indeed have support for Linux on Dex (finally!).